https://www.eaa-phev.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AState_Of_Charge_ManipulationTalk:State Of Charge Manipulation - Revision history2026-04-29T22:28:51ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1https://www.eaa-phev.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:State_Of_Charge_Manipulation&diff=2744&oldid=prevRjf: reply2006-06-16T20:25:46Z<p>reply</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:25, 16 June 2006</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== "PFC" vs "DC-DC" within documentation ==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Note that ''PFC'' means ''Power Factor Correction'', a technique to draw the highest possible amount of power from an AC outlet. It has nothing to do with this applications, which is DC. The reason the term ''PFC'' is used in this discussion is because some have chosen to use a particular model charger which happens to be called PFC-30 (because, when used with AC - not in this case - it is Power Factor Corrected). So, I would suggest that this approach should really be called "DC-DC converter based", or "Switcher based", to disassociate it from a particular model name of a particular brand.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Note that ''PFC'' means ''Power Factor Correction'', a technique to draw the highest possible amount of power from an AC outlet. It has nothing to do with this applications, which is DC. The reason the term ''PFC'' is used in this discussion is because some have chosen to use a particular model charger which happens to be called PFC-30 (because, when used with AC - not in this case - it is Power Factor Corrected). So, I would suggest that this approach should really be called "DC-DC converter based", or "Switcher based", to disassociate it from a particular model name of a particular brand.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[User:DavideAndrea|DavideAndrea]] 13:09, 16 June 2006 (CDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[User:DavideAndrea|DavideAndrea]] 13:09, 16 June 2006 (CDT)</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">: Yes It's an unusual situation, unfortunately Rich of [http://www.manzanitamicro.com Manzanita Micro] didn't name the chargers MM-PFC-30's or MM-PFC-50's, which I suppose I could have/may use in the future so as not to use the common abbreviation PFC while describing this particular ''PFC Based'' conversion method. It will take some work to change all of the ''PFC -> MM-PFC'' references, but that's alright as I want to make a page for the "PFC"-20-30-50 chargers once I figure out the best name for that article, perhaps [[Manzanita Micro]] and [[MM-PFC]] redirects? I'm not sure that I would go all the way to calling this conversion method "DC-DC" or "Switcher" Based as it will be utilizing features which may or may not only be found on the MM-PFC Charger/DC-DC Switcher. I'll keep in mind to try to keep those sections generic and applicable to other DC-DC/Switchers while explicitly pointing out any unique MM-PFC features realizing that we haven't really described much of the processes details yet... --[[User:Rjf|Rjf]] 15:25, 16 June 2006 (CDT)</ins></div></td></tr>
</table>Rjfhttps://www.eaa-phev.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:State_Of_Charge_Manipulation&diff=2738&oldid=prevDavideAndrea: Is appropriate to call it "PFC"?2006-06-16T18:09:31Z<p>Is appropriate to call it "PFC"?</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Note that ''PFC'' means ''Power Factor Correction'', a technique to draw the highest possible amount of power from an AC outlet. It has nothing to do with this applications, which is DC. The reason the term ''PFC'' is used in this discussion is because some have chosen to use a particular model charger which happens to be called PFC-30 (because, when used with AC - not in this case - it is Power Factor Corrected). So, I would suggest that this approach should really be called "DC-DC converter based", or "Switcher based", to disassociate it from a particular model name of a particular brand.<br />
[[User:DavideAndrea|DavideAndrea]] 13:09, 16 June 2006 (CDT)</div>DavideAndrea