General Disclaimer: (HV) (DC) injury or death hazard, use at your own risk, may void warranty. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rjf"
DavideAndrea (talk | contribs) |
(→Spammers?: reply) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Are we having a spam problem? | Are we having a spam problem? | ||
− | + | Anything I can do? | |
D'de --[[User:DavideAndrea|DavideAndrea]] 18:46, 26 July 2006 (CDT) | D'de --[[User:DavideAndrea|DavideAndrea]] 18:46, 26 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
− | : No more than usuail, I'm away on vacation so I'm not quite on top of it as I | + | : No more than usuail, I'm away on vacation so I'm not quite on top of it as I usually am. If you seen anything just revert it and I'll add it to the spam blacklist whenever I check in... --[[User:Rjf|Rjf]] 22:24, 26 July 2006 (CDT) |
::I reverted a couple of entries and blocked their IPs. I am not clear if it's OK by you if I block them, or if you prefer if I just wait for you to block them. Have a nice vacation! --[[User:DavideAndrea|DavideAndrea]] 09:51, 27 July 2006 (CDT) | ::I reverted a couple of entries and blocked their IPs. I am not clear if it's OK by you if I block them, or if you prefer if I just wait for you to block them. Have a nice vacation! --[[User:DavideAndrea|DavideAndrea]] 09:51, 27 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::Reverting is the most important part, you can block them for a day if you like but I find that they mostly strike only once from a given IP. They tend to add links though, which I add to a blacklist so that they can not post the same URL more than once. Seems to work pretty well, there are dry spells and not so quiet times... --[[User:Rjf|Rjf]] 21:39, 27 July 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 02:39, 28 July 2006
This is my Talk page, use the + link next to edit at the top of the page to start a new dialog.
The "other" CANview
Sorry, but could you explain why you removed the info on the "other" CANview product? DavideAndrea 12:05, 16 June 2006 (CDT)
- I didn't remove it, I moved it and other not directly CAN-View items to the bottom of the page [1]. I also added the CAN232 as it sounds similar the the CANview product [2]. --Rjf 15:03, 16 June 2006 (CDT)
Ah. I didn't notice. Sorry, and thanks. --DavideAndrea 16:58, 16 June 2006 (CDT)
Hybrids-Plus
Ryan, I created the page Hybrids-Plus. http://www.eaa-phev.org/index.php?title=Hybrids-Plus Would you mind coming up with some way of linking to it from the rest of the site? Thanks! --DavideAndrea 09:56, 27 June 2006 (CDT)
- I've added Hybrids-Plus to Template:Prius PHEV Options which is included at Prius PHEV & Plug-In Hybrids, aswell as the main menu. --Rjf 12:08, 27 June 2006 (CDT)
- Merci beaucoup! --DavideAndrea 12:30, 27 June 2006 (CDT)
Site structure suggestion
> I would prefer we discuss major changes to the site structure and menu system before implementing them...
- Yes, of course.
Prius PHEV TechInfo in Sidebar
Thanks for putting a link in the sidebar for the Prius Tech Info page! --DavideAndrea 07:06, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
- No problem, thanks for all your help arround the site, those pics are great. BTW, are you working directly with the Hybrids-Plus team? Be sure to let me know if I can help you guys with anything that hasn't made it to the website yet... see User talk:DavideAndrea#Prius PHEV TechInfo in Sidebar --Rjf 12:36, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
- Yes, I am working directly with the Hybrids-Plus team.You can see my name listed in the "Team members" section. Thanks for your offer of help!
--DavideAndrea 15:56, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
You cleared my confusion (Lexus vs Prius batt vtg)
>Prius Pack Voltages? >I see some unusual pack voltages listed here... > ...perhaps you're refering to some other vehicle like the HH/RX400h?
A) I am embarrassed for having made that mistake. Thanks for explaining the problem, and clearing up my confusion.
B) Don't you love Wikis? In a regular website this would have gone unchallenged. Here I rely on your help to keep me straight! Much appreciated!
--DavideAndrea 15:54, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
Spammers?
Are we having a spam problem? Anything I can do? D'de --DavideAndrea 18:46, 26 July 2006 (CDT)
- No more than usuail, I'm away on vacation so I'm not quite on top of it as I usually am. If you seen anything just revert it and I'll add it to the spam blacklist whenever I check in... --Rjf 22:24, 26 July 2006 (CDT)
- I reverted a couple of entries and blocked their IPs. I am not clear if it's OK by you if I block them, or if you prefer if I just wait for you to block them. Have a nice vacation! --DavideAndrea 09:51, 27 July 2006 (CDT)
- Reverting is the most important part, you can block them for a day if you like but I find that they mostly strike only once from a given IP. They tend to add links though, which I add to a blacklist so that they can not post the same URL more than once. Seems to work pretty well, there are dry spells and not so quiet times... --Rjf 21:39, 27 July 2006 (CDT)